The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Should Abortion Be Legal?
in United States
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
1 didn't dodge at all, you didn't read everything I wrote, or didn't understand it.
2 I've explained about what happens when rights conflict
3 I never said it was murder and that has yet to be determined/decided
4 if a fetus or what you want to abort isn't property to you, then what is it?
5 not opinion, it's the law you have a lot to learn
let me see if I can explain this in a way you can understand.
it is wrong to murder a human/person, you'd agree with that, correct? I mean the laws are pretty clear on the matter, are they not?
IF the supreme court, law, determines a baby is a baby at let's say 28 weeks then to kill it would be murder according to the law, wouldn't it?
Currently those who support late term abortions do not want the court or law to rule that a baby is baby any time before 9 months so they can kill it if they wish.
are you with me so far?
the newest anti abortion laws are designed to force the supreme court to settle this issue once and for all.
if you'd like to try and argue that a baby isn't a human or a person feel free to try.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.9  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 42%  
  Learn More About Debra
It is true in every state. The arguments of truth does not hold a united state in the ability to assemble a strong removal of reasonable doubt in pursuit of criminal trial. Abortion is a description of a crime by use of admission in guilt with every state. This admission is a united state as truth because every state shares an alibi for the crime as a common defense.
In basic principle we do not need to all share an alibi of the official stop of life, the alibi also is a contradiction which states the original admission was just a lie. A woman is not in control as a assault took place that now threatens her life. Look at the basic principle not the law, the law has been written with a admission witten into it.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.08  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: pregnant woman    valid argument   basic principle   count of manslaughter.This  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
giving birth
pregnancy is a sexually transmitted disease that is always fatal
But what is your view on the bodily autonomy principle?
< life
as I said, protecting life from being taken trumps all other rights generally speaking.
specifically what I'm talking about is the active,knowingly,willful murder because of inconvenience, desire or any other non self defense claim. Society has decided this is wrong and has implemented laws accordingly for murder.
need someone else's body parts to live
a child needs to be fed and food made for them just to name a few things for which they need other's body parts to live, should allowing a child starve to death be legal because it might be annoying or inconvenient to feed them? or is bodily autonomy selective, some instances you have it and some you don't?
this is why if a definition for life/person/human is ever decided things will chance.
I do appreciate your questions.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: body parts    bodily autonomy principle   livea child   self defense claim  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
It's not "willful murder"... I will agree that it ends a life, but a fetus is not legally a person and you can only murder persons... Laws that imply so, are deeply flawed and open up avenues for aberrations where a pregnant woman in a car accident in New York or one who gave birth to a stillborn in Indiana can be charged (it happened...) with manslaughter... In fact, a fetus need not die for the state to charge a pregnant woman with a crime. Women who fell down the stairs, who ate a poppy seed bagel and failed a drug test or who took legal drugs during pregnancy — drugs prescribed by their doctors — all have been accused of endangering their children.
These laws downgrade women to 2nd class citizens with less rights than others...
I'm perfectly fine with saying that life begins at conception, and I agree that abortions are sad occurrences, mostly to the woman interrupting her pregnancy as it is never without consequences... I also agree that reducing the number of abortions is a noble goal, but it does not warrant making it illegal... People die, that is what they do, there is no escaping that fact... Whether life is worth living or not is an opinion, not a fact really...
It's a very emotional issue understandably, but emotions should not be involved when establishing laws...
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.94  
  Sources: 11  
  Relevant (Beta): 65%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .....
My reply .....You did , I specifically asked why should any implied rights of the fetus trump those of the woman?
You say ....
2 I've explained about what happens when rights conflict
My reply .....I didn’t ask for your opinion on property rights
You say .
3 I never said it was murder and that has yet to be determined/decided
My reply.......Yet you keep mentioning murder
You say
4.....if a fetus or what you want to abort isn't property to you, then what is it?
My reply .....What are you talking about?
You say .5
not opinion, it's the law you have a lot to learn
My reply .....What’s the law and where , I have a lot to learn about what exactly?
You say .....let me see if I can explain this in a way you can understand.
My reply ....Maybe you should get help as you think property rights have something to do with abortion , I don’t think anyone understands you to be honest
You say .....Is it is wrong to murder a human/person, you'd agree with that, correct? I mean the laws are pretty clear on the matter, are they not?
My reply ...Murder is the illegal premeditated taking of another humans life I see the wrongness of murder
You say .....supreme court, law, determines a baby is a baby at let's say 28 weeks then to kill it would be murder according to the law, wouldn't it?
My reply .....Has the Supreme Court determined this?
You say ......Currently those who support late term abortions do not want the court or law to rule that a baby is baby any time before 9 months so they can kill it if they wish.
are you with me so far?
the newest anti abortion laws are designed to force the supreme court to settle this issue once and for all.
My reply ......I don’t really care what courts say or do I’m a firm believer in each individual woman having the right to choose are you with me so far?
You say ......If you'd like to try and argue that a baby isn't a human or a person feel free to try.
My reply .....Whether it’s “human “ or not is immaterial to my argument , if you think a fetus is a person you need to consult a dictionary
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: say4    it.My reply   property rights   rights of the fetus trump  
  Relevant (Beta): 58%  
  Learn More About Debra
fetus is not legally a person and you can only murder persons
I haven't said one way or the other except to make a point or for arguments sake
Laws that imply so, are deeply flawed
they are trying to force the supreme court to make that determination one way or the other
I'm perfectly fine with saying that life begins at conception
so the value you put on a human life is subjective and can have virtually no value and that the life of a baby is "downgrade to 2nd class citizens with less rights than" a mother's feelings. or am I misinterpreting what you are saying?
People die, that is what they do
no one is arguing that point, that isn't murder
It's a very emotional issue understandably, but emotions should not be involved when establishing laws.
think about what you just wrote there.............if women want non life threatening abortions then what do they want them for other than for emotional reasons? the abortions laws have been established for emotional reasons, if you believe what you wrote you should be anti-abortion, you couldn't be anything else.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
As an add-on, you wrote : as I said, protecting life from being taken trumps all other rights generally speaking.
So you allow for exceptions? Which might they be?
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: life    trumps   rights   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Murder is the illegal premeditated taking of another humans life I see the wrongness of murder
I don’t really care what courts say or do I’m a firm believer in each individual woman having the right to choose are you with me so far?
Whether it’s “human “ or not is immaterial to my argument
you agree murder is wrong and yet if the court has ruled that a fetus becomes a baby at 28 weeks then you "don't really care what the courts say or do" because each individual woman has a right to..... murder?
you can't murder a non human it is 100% material, you contradict yourself perhaps you can clear that up.
if you think a fetus is a person you need to consult a dictionary
what I think is irrelevant to anyone else but me personally, if the court rules the that will be that.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
I don't allow but acknowledge there could be exceptions, death penalty comes to mind can't think of any others really, I'm not saying there aren't any it's just I can't think of any. I never want to come across as I know everything because I don't and I'm always open to the possibility someone will show me an exception or something I didn't know or wasn't aware of. So I feel the need to qualify my statements in such a manner as to leave open the possibility that I could be wrong, mistaken, not fully informed etc.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: death penalty    exceptions   possibility   exception  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .....
you agree murder is wrong and yet if the court has ruled that a fetus becomes a baby at 28 weeks
My reply .....If the courts rule that a fetus becomes a baby at 28 weeks that’s what they will agree now you’re assuming that they will also say that to abort then is murder?
You say .......then you "don't really care what the courts say or do" because each individual woman has a right to..... murder?
My reply .....No each woman has the right to abort ,
You say .....you can't murder a non human it is 100% material,
My reply .....There you go with your murder argument again which you keep saying you’re not doing , why aren’t women who abort serving life for murder?
You say .....You contradict yourself perhaps you can clear that up.
My reply .....I haven’t contradicted myself at all
You say ......what I think is irrelevant to anyone else but me personally, if the court rules the that will be that.
My reply ......So if the court says slavery is right you’d agree .....Wow !
BTW I’ve asked 5 times now and you refuse to answer......let’s try again ......Why should any implied rights of a fetus rights to life trump those of a woman’s right to abort?
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
There are a few problems when you write : " the life of a baby is downgrade to 2nd class citizens with less rights than a mother's feelings. "
1st, feelings have no rights, what are you saying??
And a fetus is not a baby, it might be one eventually but it's not one while in the womb, while in there it's a fetus... But it's a known tactic used to misrepresent the nature of the fetus to appeal to emotions... A caterpillar is not a butterfly, it might be one eventually but it's not one yet...
Are you saying that wanting non life threatening surgery is an emotional reason??? Ahem....Safety reasons maybe? You know, the "non-life threatening" part was a good clue imo...
There are practical reasons, economical reasons, quality of life reasons, and a lot of other reasons I guess... Abortion laws were not pass for emotional reasons but for safety and individual freedom reasons...
You know, if I was a woman and got pregnant I don't think I'd chose abortion personally, but never would I dare to presume I have the right to tell anyone that they, don't have the right to make that choice for themselves, they are the one who'll live with the consequences after all, not me...
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
why aren’t women who abort serving life for murder?
if you can decipher what John_C_87 is saying, he explains it best, in essence what he is saying it's a crime that goes unreported, can't be reported and doesn't have to be admitted to HIPPA plays a role in that as does the right to not confess to a crime, if a woman is taken to court and asked if she had an abortion she doesn't have to answer, if the doctor is taken in he doesn't have to answer either etc etc at least I think that's what he is saying, it can be difficult to decipher what he says.
If the courts rule that a fetus becomes a baby at 28 weeks that’s what they will agree now you’re assuming that they will also say that to abort then is murder?
if it is determine to be a baby/person/human and you kill it, how is that not murder? how does that differ from killing any other person? what makes it different?
Why should any implied rights of a fetus rights to life trump those of a woman’s right to abort?
I've answered it several times, I'll try a different way
We agree murder is bad, so if at 28 weeks it is a baby/person then to kill it is murder and it is bad, to not murder/kill it inconvenience or causes some kind of emotional distress to the woman, so the life of a baby/human is more important than feelings and you have to pick one or the other in this circumstance, which is more important feelings or protecting, not killing/murder a baby/person/human? you seem to value feelings more than human life which the courts do not and would not if a ruling came down that at 28 weeks it was a baby/person/human.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.6  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: rights of a fetus rights    nbsp   murder   women  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
The woman plans then causes the same death continually every month by refusing of sexual intercourse. The issue is to create all woman as equal so they may defense the united States Constitution accordingly, a woman who is married and a woman who is not married have some clear inequalities as the marriage license gives a woman and her a union of vital information in timely remedy. also understand when a woman was voted into the Armed Services of the united states Civil service it was done with the clear understanding that rape was now added as a weapon of war not just a violation of civil law.
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.98  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: woman plans    united States Constitution   marriage license   clear inequalities  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
the minimum value of a human life is that you can't unjustly take it, aka murder, that is not subjective, unless you want to get philosophical then we might agree life is pointless so nothing really matters anyway.
feelings have no rights
not compared to the right to life, the law does not protect you from me hurting your feelings, but it does protect you from me hurting your body
And a fetus is not a baby
I'm not arguing one way or the other, this was based on a assumption of how the court may rule and if they ruled a certain way what might happen.
Are you saying that wanting non life threatening surgery is an emotional reason?
give me non emotional reasons then, btw "safety" is a feeling, emotion
Abortion laws were not pass for emotional reasons but for safety and individual freedom reasons
yeah, um no, I believe they were passed for emotional reasons, freedom? you mean so they could feel free?
don't have the right to make that choice for themselves, they are the one who'll live with the consequences after all
but again based on the assumption I have explained she is making a decision to kill/murder which she does not have the right to do and yes we all live with consequences for events we create and ones we don't
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
"The woman plans then causes the same death continually every month by refusing of sexual intercourse."
the genetics of conception are unique and potential to become a human being, an unfertilized egg does not, the deaths are not the same at all, you are factually incorrect.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
The reason why the government can and must enforce laws against murder of members of their society is because murder of a member is disruptive to society, and that's the sole purpose of the Law and the government, to insure order in society... Not because something is ultimately right or ultimately wrong, governments don't deal in what's right or wrong, philosophy and faith do, but both philosophy and faith are personal in ways no other things are, right? You wouldn't want the government to impose a particular belief on you, right?
The only valid rationale for being against the right to abortion, from a government stand point, would be to try and demonstrate factually, that abortion is disruptive to society, in what ways and to which extent compared to other disruptive occurrences, unless you live in a theocracy...
Then there might be grounds for something... Otherwise, it's a private matter between the pregnant woman and her own conscience or her god if she fancies one, no one else...
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: murder of members of their society    private matter   only valid rationale   particular belief  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .....
if you can decipher what John_C_87 is saying, he explains it best,
My reply .....I can decipher nothing he says the man is unhinged
You say .......in essence what he is saying it's a crime that goes unreported,
My reply .....It’s not a crime where I live where are you talking about what country?
You say .....can't be reported and doesn't have to be admitted to HIPPA plays a role in that as does the right to not confess to a crime,
You say .....If it was legally a crime it would and could be reported as happened in times past
You say .....if a woman is taken to court and asked if she had an abortion she doesn't have to answer, if the doctor is taken in he doesn't have to answer either etc etc at least I think that's what he is saying, it can be difficult to decipher what he says.
My reply .....She does have to answer if it is a crime in your society also a doctor who carries out abortions illegally would lose his job
You say .....If the courts rule that a fetus becomes a baby at 28 weeks that’s what they will agree now you’re assuming that they will also say that to abort then is murder?
My reply .....If the courts rule Blacks are to be given second class citizens rights would you agree with the courts if not why not?
You say ......if it is determine to be a baby/person/human and you kill it, how is that not murder? how does that differ from killing any other person? what makes it different?
My reply .....All you ask is If ,If questions .....the courts have decided so far it’s not murder so do you agree then it’s not murder if not why not?
You say ......I've answered it several times, I'll try a different way
My reply .....You haven’t
You say ......We agree murder is bad,
My reply .....You keep saying you’re not saying women who abort are murderers yet here you go again saying they are , do you want women who abort given 25 year jail sentences For murdering a baby if not why not?
You say.........so if at 28 weeks it is a baby/person
My reply .....It’s not a baby , newborn or infant refers to a baby from birth to two months , I also note you’re now saying an unborn is a wait for it ......person .....oh dear
You say.....then to kill it is murder and it is bad, to not murder/kill it inconvenience or causes some kind of emotional distress to the woman, so the life of a baby/human is more important than feelings and you have to pick one or the other in this circumstance, which is more important feelings or protecting, not killing/murder a baby/person/human?
My reply .....So the woman is a murderer and she is also not entitled to bodily autonomy because “ hey it’s only her feelings “ after all
You say ...... you seem to value feelings more than human life which the courts do not or could not if a ruling came down that at 28 weeks it was a baby/person/human.
My reply .....You seem to value the feelings of a fetus more than the quality of a woman’s life , so you do agree the fetus should be granted a right and a woman’s should be denied a right , Also you do agree women should be jailed for murder of a baby the sentence for murdering a baby is around 25 years in most countries
Your whole argument is If the courts do this then it would be murder but the courts cannot at the moment so in your mind is it not murder? Do you need someone else to tell you how to think?
  Considerate: 55%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.76  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: human life    human.My reply   crime   reply  
  Relevant (Beta): 54%  
  Learn More About Debra
murder of a member is disruptive to society,
you do know that a high percentage of women who get abortions are black right? Imo this is why some are in favor of even late term, to keep their population numbers down. seems rather disruptive to society
At some point the baby will have to be delivered because of size either naturally or c-section, when a baby is that large can you explain why it should be killed rather than born and if it survives given up for adoption, because it's coming out one of those 2 ways, given that fact delivering it alive solves the problem of making the woman not pregnant anymore right? so in these instances the choices are, give birth to a live baby, kill it in utero and give birth to a dead baby, there's no escaping those facts, since the desire (feelings) is the woman doesn't want to be pregnant there is no need to kill the baby, just induced or whatever manner is used to make her not pregnant which fulfills her desires. then there's the whole partial birth abortions which do happen.
How about the babies who are delivered alive because the procedure they used to kill the baby didn't work? she delivered, she's not pregnant anymore, still kill the baby?
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: murder of a member    population numbers   live baby   late term  
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.62  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: living things    DNA      
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
This only confirms that racism is disruptive, not abortion itself...
And again, the only valid rationale for being against the right to abortion, from a government (thus legal) stand point, would be to try and demonstrate factually, that abortion is disruptive to society, in what ways and to which extent compared to other disruptive occurrences, unless you live in a theocracy...
So far you told me that racism is disruptive and I agree...
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: disruptive occurrences    population numbers   only valid rationale   late term  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
does an unfertilized egg have unique dna than the woman? no
does a fertilized egg have unique dna than the woman? Yes
one is unique the other is not.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 69%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: unique dna    unfertilized egg   living things   woman  
  Relevant (Beta): 42%  
  Learn More About Debra
you seemed to selectively ignored the 2nd part and biggest part of my post, are you going to answer the question?
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 50%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: 2nd part    biggest part of my post   question    
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
So, your question: How about the babies who are delivered alive because the procedure they used to kill the baby didn't work?
At this point, if the government want to take charge of everything regarding the well-being of this newborn from then on, it's all good, by all means go ahead and have the government take charge and assume parenthood... As soon as the fetus leaves the body of the woman, she is liberated from the burden of the pregnancy and should not be involved in any other decision regarding this newborn, she already gave up parental rights anyway by going through with the abortion procedure, so I don't see any problems with the government taking charge and responsibility from then on, because at this point we're not talking about abortion anymore...
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: overwhelming majority of abortion    early abortion   parental rights   government take charge  
  Relevant (Beta): 38%  
  Learn More About Debra
you're talking about extremely rare cases which have very little to do with the principle...
So, your question: How about the babies who are delivered alive because the procedure they used to kill the baby didn't work?
and or could be born alive, if the baby is at a gestational age where it is very likely to survive even if born early, should the woman be induced, given a c-section, made non pregnant by delivery which then removes any need to kill the baby right? The baby will be of a size that it must come out vaginally or if that's not possible c-section. The baby will exit the woman either vaginally or c-section making the woman non pregnant, does it matter if the baby is born alive or if it is killed first?
why would there be a need to kill it in this scenario?
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: c-section    rare cases   babies   possible c-section  
  Relevant (Beta): 56%  
  Learn More About Debra
As long as the fetus is in the womb, only the mother's decision matters... At this point, it still doesn't warrant government involvement... The judgment call is the prerogative of the pregnant woman alone, even at this point whether you like it or not...
There is a really good case to be made in favoring early stage abortion over late terms ones because the later the procedure take place, the more traumatic and the more risky it will be for the woman... As a health concern, everything should be done to facilitate early stage abortion, the earlier the better...
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: health concern    judgment call   early stage abortion   good case  
  Relevant (Beta): 64%  
  Learn More About Debra
I think killing when it isn't necessary, causing horrific pain and brutality to another living thing, only to satisfy some emotional, feeling reason is repugnant and barbaric, clearly we do not have any common ground because I can not be so cold, unfeeling and callous as to approve such treatment of any living thing just to satisfy someone's feelings of inconvenience. I have nothing further to say.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: living thing    common ground   such treatment of any living thing   horrific pain  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
Remember, the question was "Should abortion be legal"... Not "Is abortion intrinsically wrong"... I'm only addressing the grounds for legality, nothing else...
And you are certainly entitled to this opinion, but that's all that is, an opinion...
So, you concede then, ok!
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
I understand, but there are laws against animal cruelty for example, there are standards as a civil society that we set forth and enforce as to how living things can and should be treated, late term abortion is inconsistent with those standards and laws. There are penalties for pregnant women who do drugs while pregnant, then there's the whole issue if someone else causes the death of the baby. Trying to have it both ways is inconsistent.
If the end desired result is achieved without the need to cause death then that death is optional,not needed, unnecessary to the end goal, and therefore should not be allowed in a civil society. I don't believe there is any rational argument against that just some selfish or irrational, emotional reasons.
(nice edit after my reply, there is nothing to concede, since you chose to be childish when i thought we were having an adult conversation you can go fk yourself)
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: civil society    pregnant women   nice edit   animal cruelty  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
In basic principle of the common defense to the general welfare Pregnancy Termination is made clear. Woman have been placed into the Armed Civil Service by legislation with their own action set as a united state speaking for all woman. “All woman have been created equal by their creator.” This is a form of legal Precedent.
This sets a way to now include all woman in methods in which they may be all created as equal. United in State. This includes the admission of Pregnancy abortion. Married, unwed, sexually promiscuous, individual physical training for preparation for pregnancy or pregnancies, and uninterested in sexual reproduction or condition for child labor.
The creation of all woman as equal includes as a citizen of these United States of America as nation we take part in the death of every soldier, who is murdered, who must be sent after birth to combat, to help keep combat from us. We take part in every single one of the deaths equally no exception.
As far as woman's body autonomy? It was forfeit when voted into the Congressional Armed Civil service. The burden of rape was expressed and acknowledge as a weapon which can be brought to bear apron a woman. Sex has been use on men who are or have been placed in armed services the danger in basic principle has not change, sexual disease and parenting of foregone nationals.  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Congressional Armed Civil service    armed services   own action set   basic principle of the common defense  
  Relevant (Beta): 73%  
  Learn More About Debra
Then the question becomes: How can we reduce the number of late term abortions... This is a different question, and a very good one too, here there is probably room for legislation but not in the way you'd think...
These occurrences are state specific and are thus irrelevant to the question... We're talking Federal level here (The question is should abortion be legal in the US, not in state X or Y...) and the SCOTUS has the power to overrule state laws if those laws are found to be unconstitutional so it's really at the federal level that it matters...
We can discuss those state laws separately, as there are some of those laws that I would support, depending on the intent and wording of those laws... Meaning, I can support legislation that intends to reduce the number of late term abortions or that puts criminal penalties to actions that cause death of fetuses (yes, while in the womb, at any stage), but the rationale for this support of mine isn't grounded in the alleged sanctity of life dogma and is consistent with my stance on the right to abortion...
PS: I was editing while you were responding, I had no way of knowing you were typing at that same moment...
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: late term abortion    number of late term abortions   Federal level   pregnant women  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
depending on the intent and wording of those laws
your claim that anti murder laws were made to prevent disruption in society I don't believe is true since many laws in the U.S. were based on religious practice and teachings. The determination that murder is wrong came long before modern society and laws. The view of murder is based on the opinion that human life is one the highest levels of importance. This is as it was from long ago which has been carried forth for centuries. I believe this is evident that slavery was abolished. The objection to slavery was at it's very core that human life is important because until that point slavery was legal and normal. Why is murder a disruption to society? Because people have but a high value on human life. The value came first and not because of some practical matter.
Laws reflect values, what is valued and how important it is.
state laws do differ, but most Federal laws do not, punishment can also differ, but murder being a crime does not.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: human life    anti murder laws   high value   modern society  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
1: Granting a fetus more rights to other people's body part than any born person.
In whole truth, basic principle, and legal precedent the idea created in united state with all woman, both baby and mother are to be made a slave. Female specific amputation is not Pregnancy Abortion, a American state in the constitutional union is at liberty to provide impartial separation. Not guidance made to admission of guilt from united confession of all woman held equal. Roe Vs wade did not approve abortion it describe a united state that all woman had been created equal around that was not whole truth, in order to provide tranquility this mistake must be addressed.
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: united state    Female specific amputation   Roe Vs wade   basic principle  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
Okay, so you admit DNA can be changed in living human life both naturally and by science.
you are just being pedantic Who do you believe I am trying to impress? I made it clear I do not want to participate in a united state created around a woman's admission of guilt to described murder. That you and others are smarter then me and got away with it for so long. Does not change the impact of my refusal to take part once the issue was understood by me.
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: unique dna    united state   living things   unfertilized egg  
  Relevant (Beta): 38%  
  Learn More About Debra
Saying that governments hold the opinion that human life is one the highest levels of importance, is factually false...
Need a proof that government don't find murder to be intrinsically bad, many still uphold the Death Penalty, which is nothing but state sponsored murder... And it's even worst than abortion since the person executed has full conscience and moral agency whereas fetuses do not have either... A government that actually hold this opinion (that life is of the highest importance) would never engage in wars, drone bombings, nuke dropping, etc, and certainly not death penalty...
The actual basis for objecting to slavery is a question of human rights, and human rights only apply to born persons... It's not a question of a "right to live" but a right to freedom...
I'm not saying you should like abortion, no one should force you to have an abortion if you don't want to, it's between you and your conscience or your god if you fancy one...
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
Need a proof that government don't find murder to be intrinsically bad, many still uphold the Death Penalty, which is nothing but state sponsored murder... And it's even worst than abortion since the person executed has full conscience and moral agency whereas fetuses do not have either... A government that actually hold this opinion (that life is of the highest importance) would never engage in wars, drone bombings, nuke dropping, etc, and certainly not death penalty...
It is better said that death does not hold a united state as murder even when planned. In Constitution the state of the union rests on whole truth.
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Death Penalty    state of the union rests   highest importance   united state  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Need a proof that government don't find murder to be intrinsically bad, many still uphold the Death Penalty, which is nothing but state sponsored murder... And it's even worst than abortion since the person executed has full conscience and moral agency whereas fetuses do not have either... A government that actually hold this opinion (that life is of the highest importance) would never engage in wars, drone bombings, nuke dropping, etc, and certainly not death penalty...
that's not proof and here is why, a person facing the death penalty has had their rights revoked and or they have forfeited their rights because of their actions, your attempting to draw some kind of comparison between a murder and an innocent is absurd. Our actions can forfeit our rights via laws and justice.
wars have to be justified and are justified in the same way as a self defense claim, they are suppose t be anyway. while casualties happen wars are not suppose to be waged against the innocent so again not a valid comparison.
you have not proven that laws against murder are to prevent discord in society, I have given plenty of context and precedent to why that claim is incorrect, repeating your statements is not an argument and I've addressed your reasoning "that government don't find murder to be intrinsically bad"
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
No you didn't, but that's ok...
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 63%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: nbsp         
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 78%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.88  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 22%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 20%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: AINT NOBODIES DIFFERENCE         
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
A human kidney does not become a citizen of a nation. A woman can pick a process which may lengthen a life. The woman must then predict her ability to provide living services for that life over a timetable. The right to body autonomy is negated by united states for woman by the induction into Congressional armed civil service. This took place and has been approved as legal precedent. Though not combat the idea of death and sacrifice of life is addressed here by this admission made to serve in an elevated threat of operation. All woman has been created equal by their creator.
More importantly the woman has forfeited the right to body autonomy as when impregnated by enemy she is immediately treated as a casualty of war removing the means of her threat to life. In united state the promise by induction into an armed civil service is an acknowledgement to sacrifice of life to that civil service. Not just her life but the lives of those who are around her.
Pregnancy abortion cannot be used as a united state period. Woman have placed woman into the armed civil services. In a group which creates all woman as equal. Independence of every woman is not the only concern of the way a citizen in established by her any more. The admission of Pregnancy abortion is creating and independence that she is acting alone. She is not. In the position of civil service a civil war which is an act of War by an domestic enemy describes a woman's readiness to serve the United state in Constitution. Even if that united state is death in common defense of the general welfare.
There are issues that America addresses by united state constitution which are being addressed internationally with nations which do not hold a united state by basic principle and legal precedent. This includes North Korea, China, and the Soviet Republic.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: united states    America addresses   nbsp   united state  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
Asking for a pardon/immunity from the public is not acceptable as justification to create a legislated admission as common defense to the general welfare. We are addressing an issue that has global impact on a United State of Constitution. North Korea, China, and the Soviet Republic all also address a woman's united state in their civil serves.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: North Korea    Soviet Republic   global impact   common defense  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
What concerns me the most about pregnancy abortion over the years of debate is the relationship in united state between the accusation of rape as a justification the admitting a confessed murder. The united state these two issues share with the pregnancy is they occur after sexual activity has ended.
In basic principle as united state all woman in truth stop immigration into the United States of America. Any woman in the world is simple doing likewise as a united state by basic principle. This in truth creates all woman as equal the female specific amputation is not an abortion is, the medical process was an official end to an abortion made on the women’s ovulation. The end of ovulation in truth is the reason for the immigration of person into the United States of America.
Death of the egg a woman holds can be held equal to immigration as she is simply stopping the process of entry into the united states. Time tables around the allowance by constitutional application can be much more effective in a common defense to the general welfare of all people.
All men are created equal by their creator.
Al woman are created equal by their creator.
All people are created equal by their creator.
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: united state    truth stop immigration   process of entry   basic principle  
  Relevant (Beta): 70%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: human kidney    woman   ability   citizen of a nation  
  Relevant (Beta): 51%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 43%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: rape survivors    KMA      
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: rape survivors    point   false dichotomy   Christians  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
A woman does not have to sponsor a new citizen on behalf of law or state. Adoption is not an alternative to pregnancy it is an alternative to undertaking parenting the child. Termination of the pregnancy is something which would need to be proven on its own merit without admission by a claim of abort. A woman is terminating an abortion on ovulation to insure domestic tranquility by illegal or legal entry into a Country.
This is a constitutional United State you are arguing a crime of sexual assault and it is not a united state with all woman in America, or in the world.
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.26  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: crime of sexual assault    constitutional United State   human kidney   united state  
  Relevant (Beta): 51%  
  Learn More About Debra
In all other cases, I would support restrictions after a specified period of time, say perhaps around twenty weeks. At twenty weeks it is very likely the mother knows that they are pregnant, and they have had ample time to decide what to do prior to that deadline.
Ultimately, I would demand that abortion be safe, legal but as RARE AS POSSIBLE. It is NOT a suitable substitute for contraception and one should not avail oneself of the procedure simply for the sake of "convenience" at a late date in the term.
---Leon Russell, "Magic Mirror"
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 69%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: CheckerbordStrangler    prochoice      
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
I can understand that some people feel uncomfortable with late therm abortions, although I personally am not. Reducing their numbers is a noble goal as early abortions are much safer and less traumatic for the woman.
But then, if this is the goal (reducing late term abortions), every effort should be put into facilitating early abortions, but many states have implemented policies based on religious dogmas, which makes it harder to have an early abortion... The end result is more late terms abortions...
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: late therm abortions    late term abortions   early abortions   noble goal  
  Relevant (Beta): 64%  
  Learn More About Debra